Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3820 outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3820 is 1418 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Performs up to 65% better in Immortals of Aveum than Phenom X4 9650 - 28 vs 17 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 8 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
28
100%
Value, $/FPS
$11.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$319.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $319.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Core i7-3820 |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i7 |
Agena | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 130 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |