Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7900X outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom X4 9650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7900X is 3378 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i9-7900X - $19.95 vs $325.0
- Up to 91% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i9-7900X - $0.16 vs $1.8 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Performs up to 50% better in War Thunder than Phenom X4 9650 - 181 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 20 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
121
66.85082872928176%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
181
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.8/FPS
8.88888888888889%
Price, $
$325
6%
FPS Winner
Buy for $325 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
16.736990154711673%
Multi-Core
765
8.711991800478305%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Core i9-7900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i9 |
Agena | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |