Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4460 outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom X4 9650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4460 is 2236 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i5-4460 - $39.99 vs $64.04
- Up to 19% better value when playing Starfield than Core i5-4460 - $0.98 vs $1.21 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460
- Performs up to 29% better in Starfield than Phenom X4 9650 - 53 vs 41 FPS
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 84 vs 95 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
41
77.35849056603774%
Value, $/FPS
$0.98/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3717 minutes ago
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
FPS
53
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.21/FPS
80.99173553719008%
Price, $
$64.04
62%
FPS Winner
Buy for $64.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3721 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
22.645099904852522%
Multi-Core
765
26.127049180327873%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Core i5-4460 |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | May 11th, 2014 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i5 |
Agena | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 84 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |