Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6700T outperforms the more expensive Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6700T is 2714 days newer than the more expensive Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 5% better in Dead Space than Phenom X4 9550 - 150 vs 143 FPS
- Up to 47% cheaper than Phenom X4 9550 - $99.9 vs $189.95
- Up to 50% better value when playing Dead Space than Phenom X4 9550 - $0.67 vs $1.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 8 vs 4 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $189.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
150
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 119 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i7 |
Agena | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |