Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom X4 9550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 5765 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $189.95 vs $369.56
- Up to 44% better value when playing Stray than Core i7-14700F - $1.09 vs $1.95 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 9% better in Stray than Phenom X4 9550 - 190 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 28 vs 4 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
174
91%
Value, $/FPS
$1.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $189.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 96 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
190
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.95/FPS
55%
Price, $
$369.56
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for $369.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 96 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | Intel Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i7 |
Agena | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 20 |
4 | Threads | 28 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
65 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |