Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-13100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-13100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 369 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-13100.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-13100 - 482 vs 456 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-13100 - 28 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $138.98 vs $369.57
- Up to 61% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i7-14700F - $0.3 vs $0.77 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
482
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
38%
Price, $
$369.57
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for $369.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13062 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
456
94%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$138.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $138.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13063 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-14700F | vs | Intel Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
20 | Cores | 4 |
28 | Threads | 8 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 60 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |