Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Athlon 3000G outperforms the more expensive Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Athlon 3000G is 4255 days newer than the more expensive Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 7% better in Overwatch 2 than Phenom X4 9550 - 333 vs 311 FPS
- Up to 48% cheaper than Phenom X4 9550 - $98.75 vs $189.95
- Up to 51% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Phenom X4 9550 - $0.3 vs $0.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 35 vs 95 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
311
93.3933933933934%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
49.18032786885246%
Price, $
$189.95
51%
Buy for $189.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
333
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.75
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $98.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
234
24.45141065830721%
Multi-Core
712
36.050632911392405%
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Athlon |
Agena | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |