Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Phenom II X4 810 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 3104 days newer than Phenom II X4 810.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 810
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 26% better in Rust than Phenom II X4 810 - 185 vs 147 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 810 - 24 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
185
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$270
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3998 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Feb 9th, 2009
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 810 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Feb 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Deneb | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |