Buy on Amazon
$193.93
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-7400T outperforms the more expensive FX-9370 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-7400T is 1302 days newer than the more expensive FX-9370.
Advantages of AMD FX-9370
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Performs up to 3% better in Rocket League than FX-9370 - 697 vs 675 FPS
- Up to 73% cheaper than FX-9370 - $52.0 vs $193.93
- Up to 76% better value when playing Rocket League than FX-9370 - $0.07 vs $0.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 35 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
AMD FD9370FHHKWOF FX-9370 FX-Series 8-Core Black Edition
Buy for $193.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17219 minutes ago
Core i5-7400T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
697
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.07/FPS
100%
Price, $
$52
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel BX80677I57400T 7th Generation Intel Core i5-7400T Processor
Buy for $52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17220 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
FX-9370
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Core i5-7400T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9370 | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 220 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
