Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - $52.0 vs $208.99
- Up to 73% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-10700KF - $0.42 vs $1.53 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 10% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-7400T - 137 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 16 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2173 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
137
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.53/FPS
27%
Price, $
$208.99
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for $208.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2173 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7400T | vs | Intel Core i7-10700KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |