Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $52.0 vs $225.99
- Up to 76% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-10700F - $0.34 vs $1.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 3% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-7400T - 160 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 16 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2074 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
160
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.41/FPS
24%
Price, $
$225.99
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2073 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7400T | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |