Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 1301 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - $52.0 vs $279.0
- Up to 79% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-10850K - $0.52 vs $2.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 13% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-7400T - 113 vs 100 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 20 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1891 minutes ago
Buy for $279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1890 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7400T | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |