Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10850K is 2834 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - $185.0 vs $279.0
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 63% better in F1 23 than FX-8350 - 244 vs 150 FPS
- Up to 7% better value when playing F1 23 than FX-8350 - $1.14 vs $1.23 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18074 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
244
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$279
66%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18075 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |