Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 2834 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - $182.02 vs $280.0
- Up to 28% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-10850K - $1.17 vs $1.63 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 11% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than FX-8350 - 172 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
155
90.11627906976744%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$182.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $182.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
172
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.63/FPS
71.77914110429448%
Price, $
$280
65%
FPS Winner
Buy for $280 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |