Buy on Amazon
$178.02
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $319
Availability
MSRP in USD: $319
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600K outperforms the cheaper FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14600K is 3332 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i5-14600K - $178.02 vs $235.6
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600K
- Performs up to 19% better in Deathloop than FX-8320E - 200 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-8320E Octa-core (8 Core) 3.20 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+OEM Pack - 8 MB - 8 MB Cache - Yes - 4 GHz Overclocking Speed - 32 nm - 95 W - FD832EWMW8KHK
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
Intel® Core™ i5-14600K Desktop Processor 14 Cores (6 P-Cores + 8 E-Cores) up to 5.3 GHz
Buy for $235.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-8320E
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Core i5-14600K
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i5-14600K |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 14 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using FX-8320E or Core i5-14600K
Deathloop, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
95 FPS
$20/FPS
GeForce RTX 4060
Core i5-14600K
32 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$1,899.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
