Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900X outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900X is 2187 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-9900X - $106.06 vs $556.0
- Up to 75% better value when playing Rust than Core i9-9900X - $0.69 vs $2.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900X - 95 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900X
- Performs up to 29% better in Rust than FX-8300 - 199 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 20 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $106.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10886 minutes ago
Buy for $556 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10891 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |