Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7100T outperforms the more expensive FX-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7100T is 1533 days newer than the more expensive FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 6% better in Apex Legends than FX-8300 - 271 vs 256 FPS
- Up to 54% cheaper than FX-8300 - $51.6 vs $112.02
- Up to 57% better value when playing Apex Legends than FX-8300 - $0.19 vs $0.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $112.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2789 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
271
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2790 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |