Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1752 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 58% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $112.02 vs $269.0
- Up to 53% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $0.93 vs $1.99 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 12% better in Far Cry 3 than FX-8300 - 135 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 24 vs 8 threads
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $112.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
135
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.99/FPS
46%
Price, $
$269
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for $269 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Vishera | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |