Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 4003 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - $64.03 vs $259.99
- Up to 32% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i5-13600K - $0.69 vs $1.01 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 177% better in FIFA 23 than FX-8150 - 258 vs 93 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
258
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.01/FPS
68%
Price, $
$259.99
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for $259.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |