Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400 outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400 is 4102 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i5-13400 - $78.02 vs $199.0
- Up to 34% better value when playing Far Cry 6 than Core i5-13400 - $0.87 vs $1.32 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 68% better in Far Cry 6 than FX-8120 - 151 vs 90 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
90
59.60264900662252%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44061 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
151
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.32/FPS
65.9090909090909%
Price, $
$199
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for $199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44060 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |