Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400 is 1457 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 8% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-9400F - 131 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i5-13400 - $85.0 vs $199.0
- Up to 54% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-13400 - $0.7 vs $1.52 per FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8147 minutes ago
Buy for $85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8142 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |