Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100T outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-8100T is 2364 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i3-8100T - $78.02 vs $204.0
- Up to 61% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i3-8100T - $0.67 vs $1.7 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Performs up to 3% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than FX-8120 - 120 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
Buy for $204 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | Intel Core i3-8100T |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |