Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1564 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 80% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $55.0 vs $270.0
- Up to 75% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $0.39 vs $1.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 21% better in Dirt 5 than FX-6350 - 170 vs 141 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 24 vs 6 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
170
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.59/FPS
24%
Price, $
$270
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 188 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Vishera | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |