Buy on Amazon
$98.04
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $132
Availability
MSRP in USD: $132
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5820K outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-5820K is 678 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i7-5820K - $98.04 vs $429.95
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 95 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Performs up to 4% better in Deathloop than FX-6300 - 175 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 12 vs 6 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-6300 3.5GHz AM3+ Desktop Processor Boxed
Buy for $98.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
Intel CM8064801548435 CORE I7-5820K Processor (15M Cache, UP to 3.60 GHZ)
Buy for $429.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-6300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Core i7-5820K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i7-5820K |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
| FX | Collection | Core i7 |
| Vishera | Codename | Haswell E |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 6 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 17.5x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using FX-6300 or Core i7-5820K
Deathloop, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
6 FPS
$231.48/FPS
GeForce GT 710
FX-6300
8 GB, 240 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,388.88
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
