Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 3443 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - $29.65 vs $140.0
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 19% better in Overwatch 2 than FX-6100 - 375 vs 316 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 12 vs 6 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $29.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75664 minutes ago
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75665 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |