Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

FX-4350 vs Celeron G3900

FX-4350 vs Celeron G3900: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 855 days newer than FX-4350.

Advantages of AMD FX-4350

  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads

Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900

  • Performs up to 1% better in Rocket League than FX-4350 - 678 vs 674 FPS
  • Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 51 vs 125 Watts
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
This is a free version of Rocket League.
Rocket League

Rocket League

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

High Quality

AMD FX-4350 Logo
FX-4350

Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013


FPS

674

99.41002949852508%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015


FPS

678

100%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

$39.9

100%

FPS Winner

Intel Celeron G3900 2.8GHz Dual-Core Processor SR2HV LGA 1151 (CM8066201928610)

Buy for $39.9 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 75446 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

High Quality

AMD FX-4350 Logo
FX-4350

Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

AMD FX-4350 Logo
FX-4350

Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013


Single-Core

469

80.72289156626506%

Multi-Core

1216

100%

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015


Single-Core

581

100%

Multi-Core

992

81.57894736842105%

AMD FX-4350 Logo

AMD FX-4350

vs
Intel Celeron G3900 Logo

Intel Celeron G3900

Apr 29th, 2013Release Date
Sep 1st, 2015
FXCollectionCeleron
VisheraCodenameSkylake
AMD Socket AM3+SocketIntel Socket 1151
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
4
Cores2
4
Threads2
4.2 GHz
Base Clock Speed2.8 GHz
4.3 GHzTurbo Clock SpeedNon-Turbo
125 WTDP
51 W
32 nmProcess Size
14 nm
19.5xMultiplier
28.0x
NoneIntegrated Graphics
Intel HD 510
NoOverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.