Buy on Amazon
$136.5
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400 outperforms EPYC 7742 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400 is 587 days newer than EPYC 7742.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400 - 128 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 14% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than EPYC 7742 - 117 vs 103 FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 65 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-11400
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
117
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$136.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i5-11400 Desktop Processor 2.6 GHz Cores up to 4.4 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 65W
Buy for $136.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9962 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7742
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i5-11400
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400 |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
| Rome | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 6 |
128 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 225 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 22.5x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
