Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400 outperforms EPYC 7742 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400 is 292 days older than EPYC 7742.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400 - 128 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Performs up to 4% better in Rust than EPYC 7742 - 194 vs 186 FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 65 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
194
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, $
$160.91
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $160.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5537 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400 |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
Rome | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 6 |
128 | Threads | 6 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
225 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.5x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |