Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 1760 days newer than Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 12% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-3240T - 496 vs 443 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 64 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
443
89%
Value, $/FPS
$0.06/FPS
100%
Price, $
$25.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551P | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i3 |
Naples | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
180 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |