Buy on Amazon
$19.98
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 177 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 5% better in HITMAN 2 than Celeron G3930T - 121 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 64 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
115
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.98
100%
Value Winner
Celeron G3930T 2.7 GHz Dual-Core Dual-Thread 35W CPU Processor LGA 1151
Buy for $19.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 165 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551P | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| EPYC | Collection | Celeron |
| Naples | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 180 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
