Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551 outperforms Pentium G3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551 is 1074 days newer than Pentium G3250.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551
- Performs up to 4% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Pentium G3250 - 236 vs 227 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3250 - 64 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551 - 53 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551 doesn't have integrated graphics
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
EPYC 7551
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Pentium G3250
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551 | vs | Intel Pentium G3250 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| EPYC | Collection | Pentium |
| Naples | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 180 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
