Buy on Amazon
$75
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7302P outperforms Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7302P is 946 days newer than Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield V than Core i5-7400T - 240 vs 226 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 35 vs 155 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5 Quad-core i5-7400T 2.4GHz Server Processor
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14736 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7302P
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i5-7400T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
| Rome | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 155 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
