Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7302P outperforms Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7302P is 3499 days newer than Core i3-540.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Performs up to 20% better in Rust than Core i3-540 - 183 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-540 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-540
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 73 vs 155 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14622 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i3-540 |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i3 |
Rome | Codename | Clarkdale |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
155 W | TDP | 73 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |