Buy on Amazon
$68.57
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7302P outperforms Pentium G4560 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7302P is 946 days newer than Pentium G4560.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Performs up to 23% better in The Callisto Protocol than Pentium G4560 - 102 vs 83 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4560 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4560
- Consumes up to 65% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 54 vs 155 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G4560
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
83
81%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.57
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium G4560 - 3.5 GHz - 2 cores - 4 threads - 3 MB cache - LGA1151 Socket - Box
Buy for $68.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14743 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7302P
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Pentium G4560
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Pentium G4560 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| EPYC | Collection | Pentium |
| Rome | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 155 W | TDP | 54 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
