Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms EPYC 7302P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 335 days newer than EPYC 7302P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 4% better in Death Stranding than EPYC 7302P - 230 vs 222 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 105 vs 155 Watts
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
230
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.73/FPS
100%
Price, $
$399
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6166 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Rome | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
155 W | TDP | 105 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |