Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700 outperforms EPYC 7302P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-14700 is 1615 days newer than EPYC 7302P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-14700 - 32 vs 28 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700
- Performs up to 10% better in Dead Space than EPYC 7302P - 164 vs 149 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
164
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$399.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6366 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i7-14700 |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i7 |
Rome | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 20 |
32 | Threads | 28 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
155 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |