Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the more expensive Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 482 days newer than the more expensive Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Athlon 3000G - 152 vs 148 FPS
- Up to 14% cheaper than Athlon 3000G - $84.98 vs $98.79
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $98.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
Buy for $84.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i3 |
Picasso | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |