Key Differences
In short — Centaurus Pollux 2T outperforms the cheaper MXZ on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing MXZ is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Centaurus Pollux 2T Gaming PC
- Performs up to 25% better in Escape From Tarkov than MXZ - 159 vs 127 FPS
Advantages of MXZ Gaming PC
- Up to 45% cheaper than Centaurus Pollux 2T - $749.0 vs $1369.99
- Up to 32% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Centaurus Pollux 2T - $5.9 vs $8.62 per FPS
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$8.62/FPS
68.44547563805105%
Price, $
$1369.99
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,369.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58243 minutes ago
1st Variation
FPS
127
79.87421383647799%
Value, $/FPS
$5.9/FPS
100%
Price, $
$749
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $749 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58267 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 2060
6 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
80.64 GPixel/s
68.28111769686707%
Texel Fillrate
201.6 GTexel/s
85.35139712108382%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Ryzen 5 5500
null-core
Single-Core
1871
65.55711282410653%
Multi-Core
7692
51.944894651539705%
Centaurus Pollux 2T Gaming PC | vs | MXZ Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7700 | CPU | Ryzen 5 5500 |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 2060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 500 GB SSD |
