Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — MXZ outperforms the more expensive NSX GAMING on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of MXZ Gaming PC
- Performs up to 26% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than NSX GAMING - 29 vs 23 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than NSX GAMING - $749.0 vs $799.0
- Up to 26% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than NSX GAMING - $25.83 vs $34.74 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $749 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
3rd Variation
FPS
23
79.3103448275862%
Value, $/FPS
$34.74/FPS
74.3523316062176%
Price, $
$799
93%
Buy for $799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 2060
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
80.64 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
201.6 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 3050
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
70.5109126984127%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
70.53571428571428%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
MXZ Gaming PC | vs | NSX GAMING PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 5500 | CPU | Ryzen 5 5500 |
| GeForce RTX 2060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 500 GB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
