Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation outperforms the cheaper ViprTech Ghost 2.0 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 3100% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than ViprTech Ghost 2.0 - 32 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 89% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than ViprTech Ghost 2.0 - $87.5 vs $824.99 per FPS
Advantages of ViprTech Ghost 2.0 Gaming PC
- Up to 71% cheaper than Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation - $824.99 vs $2799.99
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
FPS
32
100%
Value, $/FPS
$87.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$2799.99
29%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $2,799.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 194 minutes ago
FPS
1
3.125%
Value, $/FPS
$824.99/FPS
10.606189165929283%
Price, $
$824.99
100%
Buy for $824.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 221 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
70.09038619556286%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
57.71461716937355%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC | vs | ViprTech Ghost 2.0 Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7950X3D | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600G |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
