Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation outperforms the cheaper MSI Codex R2 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing MSI Codex R2 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 22% better in Control than MSI Codex R2 - 109 vs 89 FPS
Advantages of MSI Codex R2 Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 64% cheaper than Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation - $999.99 vs $2799.99
- Up to 56% better value when playing Control than Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation - $11.24 vs $25.69 per FPS
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
FPS
109
100%
Value, $/FPS
$25.69/FPS
43.75243285325029%
Price, $
$2799.99
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for $2,799.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
Jan 30th, 2024 • 1st Variation
FPS
89
81.65137614678899%
Value, $/FPS
$11.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$999.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $999.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Jan 30th, 2024 • 1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
Jan 30th, 2024 • 1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
97.04190632703367%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
68.50348027842227%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Jan 30th, 2024 • 1st Variation
Core i5-14400F
2.5 GHz | 10-core
Single-Core
2350
80.53461274845785%
Multi-Core
11359
57.85666989252789%
Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC | vs | MSI Codex R2 Gaming Desktop PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Jan 30th, 2024 |
Ryzen 9 7950X3D | CPU | Core i5-14400F |
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |