Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation outperforms the cheaper ViprTech Ghost 3.0 Liquid-Cooled on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ViprTech Ghost 3.0 Liquid-Cooled is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 116% better in Dead Space than ViprTech Ghost 3.0 Liquid-Cooled - 166 vs 77 FPS
Advantages of ViprTech Ghost 3.0 Liquid-Cooled PC
- Up to 85% cheaper than Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation - $924.99 vs $6349.99
- Up to 69% better value when playing Dead Space than Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation - $12.01 vs $38.25 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
166
100%
Value, $/FPS
$38.25/FPS
31.39869281045752%
Price, $
$6349.99
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for $6,349.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77362 minutes ago
1st Variation
FPS
77
46.3855421686747%
Value, $/FPS
$12.01/FPS
100%
Price, $
$924.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $924.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77391 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 3070
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
165.6 GPixel/s
37.339346110484776%
Texel Fillrate
317.4 GTexel/s
24.6046511627907%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Ryzen 5 5600G
3.9 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1918
65.72995202193283%
Multi-Core
7665
39.041409871135336%
Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC | vs | ViprTech Ghost 3.0 Liquid-Cooled PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7950X3D | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600G |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3070 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 10 TB HDD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
