Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation outperforms Adamant Custom 24-Core Liquid Cooled Video Editing Rendering Media Workstation on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 1% better in Overwatch 2 than Adamant Custom 24-Core Liquid Cooled Video Editing Rendering Media Workstation - 423 vs 418 FPS
- Up to 1% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Adamant Custom 24-Core Liquid Cooled Video Editing Rendering Media Workstation - $18.68 vs $18.90 per FPS
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FPS
423
100%
Value, $/FPS
$18.68/FPS
100%
Price, $
$7899.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $7,899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8499 minutes ago
FPS
418
99%
Value, $/FPS
$18.9/FPS
99%
Price, $
$7899.99
100%
Buy for $7,899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8503 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Adamant Custom 24-Core Liquid Cooled Video Editing Rendering Media Workstation Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7950X3D | CPU | Core i9-14900K |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 10 TB HDD |
