Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Adamant Custom 24-Core Liquid Cooled Video Editing Rendering Media Workstation outperforms Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Adamant Custom 24-Core Liquid Cooled Video Editing Rendering Media Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 3% better in Valorant than Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation - 1007 vs 978 FPS
- Up to 3% better value when playing Valorant than Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation - $7.85 vs $8.08 per FPS
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
FPS
1007
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.85/FPS
100%
Price, $
$7899.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $7,899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8696 minutes ago
FPS
978
97%
Value, $/FPS
$8.08/FPS
97%
Price, $
$7899.99
100%
Buy for $7,899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8692 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Adamant Custom 24-Core Liquid Cooled Video Editing Rendering Media Workstation Desktop PC | vs | Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900K | CPU | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 10 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
