Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Asus TUF A16 outperforms the cheaper MSI GF63 Thin 10SCXR on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of MSI GF63 Thin 10SCXR Gaming Laptop
- Up to 10% cheaper than Asus TUF A16 - $859.0 vs $949.62
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 122% better in Deathloop than MSI GF63 Thin 10SCXR - 80 vs 36 FPS
- Up to 50% better value when playing Deathloop than MSI GF63 Thin 10SCXR - $11.87 vs $23.86 per FPS
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $859 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 514 minutes ago
12th Variation
FPS
80
100%
Value, $/FPS
$11.87/FPS
100%
Price, $
$949.62
90%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $949.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 509 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
12th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
53%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
53%
12th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i5-10500
null-core
Single-Core
1519
77%
Multi-Core
5470
59%
12th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
null-core
Single-Core
1964
100%
Multi-Core
9281
100%
CPU Winner
MSI GF63 Thin 10SCXR Gaming Laptop | vs | Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-10500 | CPU | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
