Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Asus TUF A16 outperforms the cheaper MSI Katana GF76 17 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 58% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than MSI Katana GF76 17 - 76 vs 48 FPS
- Up to 6% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than MSI Katana GF76 17 - $19.46 vs $20.81 per FPS
Advantages of MSI Katana GF76 17 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 32% cheaper than Asus TUF A16 - $999.0 vs $1479.0
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
2nd Variation
FPS
76
100%
Value, $/FPS
$19.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1479
67%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,479 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
Buy for $999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 305 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
2nd Variation
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
Radeon RX 7600S
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
140.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
246.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
30%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
27%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i7-11800H
null-core
Single-Core
1900
100%
Multi-Core
7887
100%
3rd Variation
Core i7-11800H
null-core
Single-Core
1900
100%
Multi-Core
7887
100%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop | vs | MSI Katana GF76 17 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-11800H | CPU | Core i7-11800H |
| Radeon RX 7600S | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 17.3" |
