Key Differences
In short — ASUS Vivobook K6602V Personal outperforms the cheaper ASUS TUF 16" Ryzen 7 Ultimate on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ASUS TUF 16" Ryzen 7 Ultimate is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ASUS Vivobook K6602V Personal Laptop
- Performs up to 18% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than ASUS TUF 16" Ryzen 7 Ultimate - 103 vs 87 FPS
Advantages of ASUS TUF 16" Ryzen 7 Ultimate Gaming Laptop
- Up to 55% cheaper than ASUS Vivobook K6602V Personal - $910.0 vs $2019.0
- Up to 47% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than ASUS Vivobook K6602V Personal - $10.46 vs $19.6 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FPS
103
100%
Value, $/FPS
$19.6/FPS
53.367346938775505%
Price, $
$2019
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for $2,019 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32842 minutes ago
2nd Variation
FPS
87
84.46601941747572%
Value, $/FPS
$10.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$910
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $910 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32846 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
null-core
Single-Core
1964
72.36551215917466%
Multi-Core
9281
56.501887251917694%
ASUS Vivobook K6602V Personal Laptop | vs | ASUS TUF 16" Ryzen 7 Ultimate Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900 | CPU | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
40 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 16" |
