Key Differences
In short — ASUS Vivobook K6602V Personal outperforms the cheaper Asus TUF A16 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Asus TUF A16 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ASUS Vivobook K6602V Personal Laptop
- Performs up to 16% better in Minecraft than Asus TUF A16 - 656 vs 565 FPS
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Up to 60% cheaper than ASUS Vivobook K6602V Personal - $809.0 vs $2019.0
- Up to 54% better value when playing Minecraft than ASUS Vivobook K6602V Personal - $1.43 vs $3.08 per FPS
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
FPS
656
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.08/FPS
46.42857142857142%
Price, $
$2019
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for $2,019 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32312 minutes ago
13th Variation
FPS
565
86.1280487804878%
Value, $/FPS
$1.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$809
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $809 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32316 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
13th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
13th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
null-core
Single-Core
1964
72.36551215917466%
Multi-Core
9281
56.501887251917694%
ASUS Vivobook K6602V Personal Laptop | vs | Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900 | CPU | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
40 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 16" |
