Key Differences
In short — ASUS Vivobook K6602V Personal outperforms the cheaper Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5i 16″ 2.5K 120Hz, 100% sRGB, 350Nits on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5i 16″ 2.5K 120Hz, 100% sRGB, 350Nits is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ASUS Vivobook K6602V Personal Laptop
- Performs up to 45% better in Dead Space than Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5i 16″ 2.5K 120Hz, 100% sRGB, 350Nits - 74 vs 51 FPS
Advantages of Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5i 16″ 2.5K 120Hz, 100% sRGB, 350Nits Laptop
- Up to 58% cheaper than ASUS Vivobook K6602V Personal - $839.99 vs $2019.0
- Up to 40% better value when playing Dead Space than ASUS Vivobook K6602V Personal - $16.47 vs $27.28 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
74
100%
Value, $/FPS
$27.28/FPS
60.373900293255126%
Price, $
$2019
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for $2,019 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32287 minutes ago
FPS
51
68.91891891891892%
Value, $/FPS
$16.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$839.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $839.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32285 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
46.60493827160494%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
37.29327453142227%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
ASUS Vivobook K6602V Personal Laptop | vs | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5i 16″ 2.5K 120Hz, 100% sRGB, 350Nits Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900 | CPU | Core i5-13500 |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
40 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 120 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
