Key Differences
In short — acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14"" WUXGA 165Hz outperforms the cheaper Asus TUF A16 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Asus TUF A16 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Up to 18% cheaper than acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14"" WUXGA 165Hz - $938.83 vs $1149.0
- Up to 12% better value when playing World of Warcraft than acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14"" WUXGA 165Hz - $6.62 vs $7.56 per FPS
Advantages of acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14"" WUXGA 165Hz Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 5% better in World of Warcraft than Asus TUF A16 - 152 vs 145 FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
8th Variation
FPS
145
95%
Value, $/FPS
$6.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$938.83
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $938.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
FPS
152
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.56/FPS
88%
Price, $
$1149
81%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,149 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1064 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
8th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
8th Variation
Radeon RX 7600S
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
140.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
246.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
6 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
68.4 GPixel/s
49%
Texel Fillrate
171 GTexel/s
69%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop | vs | acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14"" WUXGA 165Hz Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7735HS | CPU | Core i7-12700 |
| Radeon RX 7600S | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 14" |
