Key Differences
In short — GIGABYTE - AORUS 16X (2024) outperforms the cheaper Asus TUF A16 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Asus TUF A16 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Up to 35% cheaper than GIGABYTE - AORUS 16X (2024) - $938.83 vs $1452.99
- Up to 11% better value when playing Deathloop than GIGABYTE - AORUS 16X (2024) - $13.14 vs $14.83 per FPS
Advantages of GIGABYTE - AORUS 16X (2024) Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 34% better in Deathloop than Asus TUF A16 - 98 vs 73 FPS
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
8th Variation
FPS
73
74%
Value, $/FPS
$13.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$938.83
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $938.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 126 minutes ago
Jan 16th, 2024 • 2nd Variation
FPS
98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$14.83/FPS
89%
Price, $
$1452.99
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,452.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
8th Variation
Jan 16th, 2024 • 2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
8th Variation
Radeon RX 7600S
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
140.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
246.4 GTexel/s
100%
Jan 16th, 2024 • 2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
58%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
99%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Jan 16th, 2024 • 2nd Variation
Core i7-14650HX
null-core
Single-Core
2530
100%
Multi-Core
14291
100%
CPU Winner
Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop | vs | GIGABYTE - AORUS 16X (2024) Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Jan 16th, 2024 |
| Ryzen 7 7735HS | CPU | Core i7-14650HX |
| Radeon RX 7600S | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
